Look at the sun through my eyes...

Look at the sun through my eyes

They're ex-ing the sky, crosshatch and hopscotch
in plain broad daylight, spraying who knows what.
It used to be called a conspiracy theory
laughed at by mainstream all mocking and jeering
until Joe Public started to notice and then they applied
some hocus-pocus media magic PR spin
to tell us that Mother Earth's prospects are dim
unless we avert the climate catastrophe
caused by sunshine - in case you're asking
and also by mankind we're led to believe
for we are the carbon they'd like to delete
to achieve that perfect golden number
written on stone, then torn asunder.

Interesting though how market trends
follow the beat of Big Boy investments
almost as if the public perception
is engineered to perfect selection
of just those things previously unheard of
that materialised 'ahead of the curve'.
Translated, this means it was always planned
to create the goods and then, the demand.

And what better way to convince the masses
these things are necessary to 'save the planet'
than engaging the big propaganda machine
mass-distraction pumped out from screens
spitting out fear on a daily basis 
about climate, war and far-right racists
people so addled they can no longer see
behind the camera to a bigger scene
where the whole shit-show is and always has been
directed with strings pulled by power and greed.

But here's the thing...

You can fool some people all of the time 
and all of the people some of the time
but dogs on the street know that if you try
to fool all the people all of the time
the cracks become deeper and far too wide
to fill with a slick, smart media campaign
and those people ask questions
about loss and gain.

© Áine Fortune 2026   

Up to a few years ago, the subject of weather manipulation or ‘geoengineering’, was dismissed among the general public, as ‘woo-woo’ or ‘conspiracy theory’, despite significant advances in governmental and especially, military research in this area since the 1940s at least. Research was so successful in fact, that in 1976, the United Nations (UN) adopted a ‘Convention on the Prohibition of military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques’. (1)

We have been told persistently for decades now, that the increasing, significant (and sometimes disastrous) weather events experienced globally, are a result of man-made (anthropogenic) ‘Climate Change’ rather than man-made weather manipulation (geoengineering). This mantra has been indoctrinated over and over through mass-media and large-scale, inter-governmental and NGO ‘education’ campaigns.

However, in tandem with a plummet in public faith in international political governance a few years ago, larger numbers of people started to notice long and often bizarre trails in the sky, which raised concern about what we are not being told. Suddenly, PB (Plan B or Public Bamboozlement - take your pick), was put into action, through the primary Public Relations (propaganda) channel of the Corpocracy, aka mass media. Strategy changed tack almost overnight and an alleged need to ‘block the sun’ to avert ‘climate catastrophe’ was duly drip-fed and then flooded through commercial media outlets promoting the ‘follow the science’ brigade once again.

If amnesia was not a public epidemic however, people might remember that we were previously told these extreme fluctuations in normal weather-patterns over preceding decades, were due to said ‘Climate Change’ and that man-made weather-manipulation (geoengineering) as a factor in these changes, was ‘conspiracy theory’. Unfortunately, amnesia is rife and contagious, so the doctrine of ‘Bad-Sun’ has been ushered in smoothly, with nary a quizzical mainstream eyebrow raised about the previous denial of geoengineering as a factor in extreme weather events.

There are many, many opinions about the who, what, why of these trails in the sky, so I shall simply state my observations:

Summertime - the sky is clear and blue, sun shining gloriously. If the planes that fly over only have normal short condensation (con) trails - predominantly carbon dioxide and water vapour - the sky remains blue and the sun remains unfiltered. Like so…

If, however, there is a long trail left by the plane, which stretches right across the sky, and then spreads out, becoming wider along its length (which normal con trails do not), and more planes come in quick succession doing the same, soon the whole sky is effectively hazed. The duration of ‘haze’ varies for reasons I know not - sometimes clearing within half an hour and sometimes remaining for the whole day. What I know for sure however, is that these are neither normal con trails nor clouds…

Cosmos to Core

Aside from weather manipulation, changes in weather patterns also occur due to cosmic and seismic activity, as has always been the case. Gaia (Mother Earth) is entirely inter-connected with the cosmos and what happens ‘out there’ necessarily affects what happens on this planet; while seismic activity from within her core, naturally expresses itself through earthquakes and volcanoes, precipitating extreme weather events alongside surface chaos.

Thus, to claim that mankind is causing ‘Climate Change’ is megalomaniac in the extreme. Generally speaking, apart from a massive and cataclysmic cosmic or seismic event, large enough to precipitate an immediate and apocalyptic change in the earth’s atmosphere, climate alters over millennia, as evidenced by the rock record, which geologists, not meteorologists, are qualified to assess.

Yet, we have so-called ‘experts’ talking about ‘man-made climate-change’, over a relatively short period of time. One such ‘expert’ I recently had the misfortune to hear at a seminar, explained how Ireland’s climate was, in fact, changing on a month by month basis. How these people can call themselves ‘scientists’ eludes me. A particular bug-bear of mine, is the term ‘Climate Denier’, sometimes used by these ‘experts’, and oft-repeated on social media, which to me, reveals a poor command of the English language more than any scientific prowess.

Another noteworthy one is ‘carbon neutral’. Since carbon is the basic building block for ALL life from large to small, to be ‘carbon neutral' is to be dead and even then, carbon carries on, transformed into another form of life.

Who benefits from Climate Fear?

Of course, there is always an ulterior motive for the creation of fear among the general public. In her article on geoengineering regulation (referenced below), Mary Church, Geoengineering Campaign Manager at the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), notes that “…the voluntary carbon markets and decisions at the 2024 UN Climate Conference (COP29) risk creating a backdoor for geoengineering commercialization…” (2)

Big Business profits massively as whole new ‘markets’ develop around ‘Climate Awareness’ and ‘Climate Preparedness’, the most dangerous of which, in my opinion, is lab-produced food for human and animal consumption. This is proffered as being better for the environment than farming, something humans have done for aeons to feed themselves and yet we are now led to believe is somehow ‘dirty’, contributing to ‘climate change’ and thus, should be phased out.

Though I will concede that intensive, industrial-scale farming is indeed harmful to land, animals, people and delicate eco-systems, this is the result of Big Business hoovering up small-scale local food production to amplify ‘economies of scale’, whereby ever-increasing profit margins supersede all else and balance is thrown to the wayside, exposing heretofore balanced local ecology, to serious damage.

It was only a matter of time before lab-produced food became an all-too-stark and now-prolific reality, once food crops were listed as ‘commodities’ for trading on the global commodities market. In other words, crop success and failure can be gambled on in the same way as any other stocks and shares. Imagine the advantage for those who know which crops will fail through, for example, knowing which regions will experience drought or flooding (geoengineering can precipitate either); or for those companies producing laboratory alternatives to mass-consumed products, such as cocoa. Yes - really. Lab-produced chocolate is hitting a shop near you soon, if it hasn’t already done so.

In this scenario, laboratory ‘bio-technology’, which can be patented and monetised, is given precedence over ancient wisdom that has served humanity for thousands of years through protecting land and water naturally, but which cannot be patented and sold. Local ecologies are suffering potentially irreversible damage as a result, including widespread drought and depletion or contamination of groundwater, which is then referred to by bio-tech giants and mass media alike as ‘natural disaster’. This David and Goliath battle is elucidated starkly by Colin Todhunter in ‘You can’t patent a trench: The real biotechnology the Green Revolution forgot’. (3)

Credit Psychology

Compounding all of this, credit psychology has now taken hold of the public mentality and virtue-signalling is the name of the game, as companies and good citizens alike, display their ‘climate credentials’ with ‘carbon credits’ and ‘climate-friendly’ products. What does that even mean? Does it mean nature-friendly? If it does, then I’m all for it. Unfortunately, I strongly suspect it is simply another marketing ploy to enhance sales, rather than any nod towards Mother Nature, while she continues to be raped and pillaged for the materials (e.g. lithium) to produce these products - not to mention the human cost of slavery and war.

Therein lies the rub: While we buy all the right ‘climate-friendly’ products at a premium price, to satisfy internal conscience and outward appearance; while we wax lyrical about carbon credits and which brand has the best climate credentials; we turn a blind eye to the cost Mother Nature is paying for our addictive need to have more ‘stuff’, as long as it’s the right brand of stuff we’re buying.

Thus, we convince ourselves that it is okay to keep consuming excessively, once all the make-believe boxes of ‘climate consciousness’ are ticked, including buying ‘carbon credits’ to ‘offset’ purchases, through investments in ‘Green Tech’, so we can pat ourselves on the back and feel justified about our choices.

Inevitably, the Corpocracy not only endorses this pat on the back but contributes, with its long tentacles reaching screens everywhere through social media virtue-signalling. At the same time, we are continually induced to keep doom-scrolling for the latest threat to our ‘safety’ and sanity, ensuring that we ‘follow the science’…

Turning life into tokens…

Water - specifically the lack and cleanliness thereof - is the current buzz within mass-distraction media on the global stage (and I use the word ‘stage’ deliberately here). Curiously, data centres, which one might consider a key tool of surveillance capitalism, and thus immune from media pressure, have become the primary target of this theatrical ‘debate’. However, as Kit Knightly argues in his well-researched article ‘Faking Water Bankruptcy Part 1: Data Centres’, there is a problem-reaction-solution ruse here, disguising a much more far-reaching endgame, the goal of which, is ultimate control of the world’s water supply. (4)

To wit, the UN is currently organising the ‘Global Water Conference’ for later this year, to tackle what it calls ‘water bankruptcy’. The major focus of this conference will be ‘re-thinking’ the global water supply. (5 & 6) Hint: This line could just as easily read ‘re-distribution’ in favour of the already ridiculously wealthy few, to the loss of the majority of people who do not control supply, and who thus, will lose access, unless they can afford to pay whatever rate is decided upon by the corporations that do. In this regard, some have already experienced a taste of what is to come, and I imagine it is indelibly printed on the memories of the population of Chennai, India…

“In the summer of 2019, Chennai reached ‘Day Zero’. As the city’s reservoirs shrank to 0.1% of their capacity, the crisis exposed a brutal hierarchy. While millions queued for hours at street corners for government tankers, the city’s luxury hotels continued to operate, fuelled by a fleet of private water tankers siphoning groundwater from surrounding villages.” - Colin Todhunter (3)

We live in a world of ‘tokenisation’, ushered in under the guise of ‘Sustainable Development Goals’, and ‘Climate Action’, which have rather cleverly cloaked the strategic placement of enabling infrastructure. This is a world where all of life - including water and soon, the air we breathe - is being assigned a ‘token’ value, which can then be traded and ‘offset’ in the global market economy, in the same way as ‘carbon credits’ are currently traded.

Make no mistake: This is the finale of a bid for total control, where all life forms are regarded by Empire, as merely ‘capital’ or ‘resources’ to be ‘capitalised’ upon, thereby funnelling more wealth and power through its executive arm of Corpocracy into the coffers of the already obscenely wealthy at its helm.

Profit and Loss - The Balance Sheet

All of this continues apace, while the very real problem mankind most definitely is causing through excessive consumption - an unprecedented bio-diversity crisis - goes either unremarked by mass distraction media, or alternately, is attributed to ‘Climate Change’. This is a clever sleight of hand on the part of the Corpocracy - engendering ‘Climate Fear’, while at the same time, ensuring that people keep consuming the products of the Corpocracy, in order to maintain high profits.

If left unchecked, the huge ecological damage being caused by the onward march of the ‘global economy’, may make this planet uninhabitable for humanity, along with millions of other species eliminated in the process. Corporate propaganda notwithstanding, we cannot consume our way out of this.

Aside from the ecological impact of excessive consumption, the products we buy do not fill the deep chasm that gapes open ever further as we dis-connect ever more from the Great Mother. Nor do they take away the uneasy feeling of fear that something is terribly wrong. Yet we carry on, telling ourselves it’s okay because we’re ‘saving the planet’ with our ‘climate-friendly’ lifestyle choices.

The underlying fear persists however. It cannot be swept aside with ‘carbon credits’ (or soon-to-be ‘water credits’), no matter how cleverly audited the profit and loss sheet is, because the part of us that remains connected to the Mother, no matter how small or tenuously attached, cannot be fooled by clever accounting.

Somewhere, deep down, we know that in this balance sheet, the Corpocracy ALWAYS profits and Mother Nature ALWAYS sustains a loss.

The thing is though, we as individuals, are the Corpocracy and at the same time, we are Nature. This is the dichotomy with which we are presented. We are never truly disconnected from the Great Mother because she is the essence of us, yet with every cent we spend, every moment of attention we give to the corporate matrix, a choice is made about which to sustain and which to deplete.

Corpocracy v Nature - Dopamine v Endorphin

Perhaps it is time to join the dots (or lines in the sky, as the case may be) and start asking questions - not just of the conveniently externalised Corpocracy but of ourselves. There is a truth staring back at us if we look beyond the black mirror of our devices: We always have CHOICE. We have agency in the creation of the world around us - healthy or otherwise - with every single choice we make, including our thoughts, words and deeds. That is the awesome power we have as individuals and as a collective.

Imagine a world then, where we choose to be more judicious in our use of synthetic technology; where we become far more discerning in our consumption of mass media and the products of a lifeless corpocracy; where instead of taking a trip into a virtual vacuum, cleverly ‘created’ and curated to suck us in through algorithmic calculations, hooks baited with dopamine-hits; we choose more often, to take a real trip into Nature and come back with free endorphins instead.

In that kind of world, we might view the sun once again as a giver of life and thus, as a beneficent friend to be celebrated, rather than as a foe to be feared.

* The stone referred to in the piece above, is what’s called the Georgia Guidestones, which were damaged by a bomb attack in 2022 and subsequently demolished. I would suggest looking up their origin and meaning but I note that information about them online has been, shall we say, ‘altered’ over the past decade. I wonder why and who it serves to erase the message on the stones about a ‘Golden Number’ of human inhabitants on this planet, which is vastly lower than the current number? Some information is still available on archive-dot-org, which benefits from the ‘Wayback Machine’ to find material that was previously available through regular searches but which has now been erased (censored) from general view.

1. United Nations ‘Convention on the Prohibition of military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques’. Adopted by Resolution 31/72 of the United Nations General Assembly on 10 December 1976. The Convention was opened for signature at Geneva on 18 May 1977. Text published in: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 31/72

2. ‘Geoengineering Governance: Restrictive Framework Must Be Upheld and Strengthened’ by Mary Church, Geoengineering Campaign Manager at the Center for International Environmental Law. Full article at ciel dot org

“Geoengineering — the large-scale manipulation of Earth’s climate — is often framed as an unregulated new frontier, where a lack of rules leaves the door open to dangerous experimentation. But this is simply not true. Across international law, human rights frameworks, and United Nations environmental agreements, a strong foundation for geoengineering governance already exists — and it is highly restrictive.

The real issue is not the absence of governance but the growing disregard for the restrictive framework that already exists. In recent years, geoengineering proponents have attempted to push forward research and field experiments despite clear international decisions that prohibit or severely limit its development. Even worse, the voluntary carbon markets and decisions at the 2024 UN Climate Conference (COP29) risk creating a backdoor for geoengineering commercialization, undermining climate action while benefiting polluters. [emphasis added]

Existing restrictive governance that prevents geoengineering development and deployment must be upheld and enforced in the immediate term. Looking forward, this precautionary framework must be the basis for developing any additional agreements and rules and ultimately build up to a global ban or non-use agreement.”

3. ‘You can’t patent a trench: The real biotechnology the Green Revolution forgot’ - Colin Todhunter in off-guardian dot org

4 & 5. ‘Faking Water Bankruptcy Part 1: Data Centres’ & ‘Part 2: Climate Change’ - Kit Knightly in off-guardian dot org

6.’They’re Coming for Your Water: Global Bankruptcy & Total Control’ - Substack video and text posts by Christian Westbrook, ‘Unshadowed (IAF)’ on Substack.